Opposing Views

Free Liberal weblog comments on a Washington Times article detailing NZ’s anti-nuclear stance, military capabilities, and reliance on its more powerful neighbor. “An interesting story about how NZ’s rather modest defense budget and decision to stay out of military conflicts has allowed the nation to … retain its independence on the global stage. Something tells me that because of policies like these (as compared to Washington’s belligerence) Wellington is pretty far down on Bin Laden’s list of targets. Oh, and before you think of NZ as a bunch of socialists, it must be noted that Heritage Foundation ranked the nation third on its 2004 index of economic freedom, a full seven slots higher than the U.S. of A.”


Tags: anti-nuclear stance  freeliberal.com  Heritage Foundation  New Zealand  Osama Bin Laden  Washington DC  Washington Post  Wellington  

Why is New Zealand so Progressive?

Why is New Zealand so Progressive?

She wasn’t the only mother checking in with their whānau that evening. But this woman was Jacinda Ardern, New Zealand’s prime minister, and the one who had decided – on expert…