|
|
|
|
In Novemeber of 2002 a book on Rewi Alley, Friend
of China - The Myth of Rewi Alley, by Anne-Marie Brady (Routledge
Curzon, $102.95) was published. A series of reviews followed, responding
to Brady's revision
of Alley's character and the mythology surrounding his life.
Some reviews claimed the book as substantiation for barely disguised parochial opinions of Alley's life; other reviewers, (while some interrogated particular claims in Brady's thesis), found it added valuable shade to a complex life lived in extraordinary circumstances; while others saw it as the definitive undercutting of the Alley myth. Heroes are not usually straightforward and often their status is contested. NZEDGE has published below a selection of the reviews to accompany the NZEDGE bio of Alley. Friend of China - The Myth of Rewi Alley sets out to examine how Alley became iconised in his own life-time and a symbol of wide-ranging political objectives in both his adopted and native countries. Brady stresses that her work is not a biography but a "revisionist assessment". One of Brady's key research
interests is the place of foreigners in China's diplomatic relations (she
is a political scientist at the University of Canterbury, speaks Chinese
fluently and teaches Chinese history and politics) and Alley becomes
something of an example. Friend of China probes the myth
and reality of Alley's life, employing the life partly as an anology to
explore the role of foreigners in China's diplomatic relations and their
sensitive place in China after 1949. Friend of China, represented 10 years of research for Brady, and is scholarly, yet readable, making a valuable contribution to the historigrapical debate and understanding of Alley's life. It is indictitive of the man and the fullness of a complex life lived in extraordinary times, that his myth remains territory to be contested and claimed. Brady writes in her introduction: “In Alley’s long and eventful life, a web of often conflicting myths was constructed by Alley and others in order to present him as an iconic symbol. “However, to say that Alley was mythologised does not take away from his actual achievements in China: in Shanghai as a factory inspector, in the Chinese Industrial Co-operatives and at the Shandan Bailie School in the 1940s, and in the 1980s, the strength of vision which saw him working to re-establish the co-operative movement and the Shandan Bailie School. “To assess the value of his work as propagandist for the Chinese government is more difficult, and perhaps worthy of further study. Nonetheless, most myths have some basis in reality, no matter how remote, and the Rewi Alley myth is no different.” Friend of China - The Myth of Rewi Alley can be ordered at amazon.com. Below, in the order of most recent first, are a selection of reviews and responses to Brady's book. Click on hyperlink to read review:
|
|
|
'Rewi Alley outing', Letters, John F Johnson, NZ Listener (22
March 2003) Dear Editor Of the Europeans who were in Shantan in the 1940s I am one of the last still living. I support Geoff Chapple (Books, March 1). In my mind, there is practically no evidence to support Brady's theories. I went to China with Courtney Archer and five others in 1945 to join the Friends Ambulance Unit, a tight-knit group of pacifists who were soon scattered to all corners of China. I met Alley at the old school at Shaman, where my unit was delivering supplies. He greeted me like an old friend, as he had known my father, probably in the 1914 war. I also knew Rewi's brother Geoff and two of his sisters through my father's work in the WEA. We stayed at Shantan for a few days to service our trucks, and again on our return journey from Suchow. The following year, in midwinter, I helped deliver the first trucks the school had owned. By this time Courtney was working at Shantan and I stayed with him, sharing his kang at nights. Kangs were brick beds with flues through them. Straw was burnt and the heat passed through the kang to make it warm to the touch. In the really cold weather families would spend the whole day and night on the kang. I remember on one trip to Lanchow with Alley and a whole truckload of boys of all ages, we stopped for the night at a roadside fantien and the whole lot of us piled on to the same kang. Alley's quarters had a kang and his family of boys shared it when they were there, as I have done. A prurient mind can easily put any sort of construction on this practice. The school had up to a hundred boys (I can't remember the exact number). They were nearly all "rescued" from the surrounding country, malnourished, disabled and totally illiterate. They had formal lessons in the morning and trade training in the afternoon. This included making all furniture and textiles, cooking meals, etc. The boys' committee organised the school, which was run on spartan lines - I imagine, in the manner of the 1914-18 New Zealand Army. There were no women there. The school occupied an old "Earth Spirits" temple, which had hundreds of life-size grotesque effigies lining the walls and some of the boys worshipped them. They also paid obeisance to George Hogg's grave in the school compound. Alley would not let any missionaries near them to evangelise. This upset other Europeans, most of whom were fundamentalist in their belief and whose mission in life was to save souls. They had no interest in practical socialism. It would be quite easy to spread rumours of homosexual practices. Male-only Catholic missions also suffered from this treatment. Alley could have gained vast financial support, especially from North America, if he had allowed evangelism. I would be surprised if Courtney Archer was an avowed homosexual at that time. In a tight-knit community such as our ambulance unit, there is little that is not known about members' social proclivities. Alley was an aggressive battler who believed the end justified the
means. I have been told that this type of personality doesn't fit that of
a paedophile. |
|
|
|
Response to Chapple, Letter to editor, Anne-Marie Brady, The
Listener, (15 March 2003) Dear Editor, Geoff Chapple’s three-page attack on my book Friend of China - The Myth of Rewi Alley, (Listener March 1-7 2003) was a bizarre example of what I describe in the book. Chapple’s main objection to the book is the “outing” of Alley as a gay man, as someone who was attracted to young Chinese men, including some of those at the school he ran in China in the 1940s at Shandan. Why should the news that a public figure such as Alley was gay cause such a stir in this day and age? The answer is that, as I argue in the book, from the 1930s and up to the present era, the life and works of Rewi Alley have been mythologised to fit a series of stereotypes: hero, villain and fool. In the New Zealand context (publicly at least) Alley is a national hero, a symbol of New Zealand manhood abroad, combining number 8 wire knowhow with warm humanitarian ideals. As Chapple’s article aptly illustrates, this model of New Zealand masculinity is implicitly heterosexual: hence no New Zealand he When I began my research on Alley I was initially reluctant to focus on
his sexuality as I felt it was irrelevant to the concerns of my area of
specialisation, political science. As I conducted my research however I
came to believe that Alley's sexuality was a key to understanding how he
managed the contradictions between his public and private persona in
various periods throughout his life. Contrary to Chapple’s claims, I
provide ample evidence in the book from interviews I conducted over a
period of ten years that attest that Alley was in fact gay. These include
interviews with those who knew him both in the 1940s in Shandan and in the
years after the communist takeover in 1949. Although two of these sources
are now dead it does not make them unreliable. What I find curious is that
Chapple, who interviewed Alley many times in preparation for his own book
and film on Alley’s life in China, and who admits he knew the rumours
that Alley was gay, never dared to ask him himself about their truth. |
|
|
'They say he was gay,' Geoff Chapple, The
Listener,
(01March 2003) Intro: A new biography has outed Rewi Alley - and reviewers have excitedly gone along with the claim, despite a serious lack of evidence. It started last November. The Sunday Star-Times interviewed Anne-Marie Brady, whose book Friend of China - The Myth of Rewi Alley was just then published. Brady had a book to sell, an outing to perform, scandalous detail to impart, and Anthony Hubbard did an obliging interview. "As a soldier fighting in France during World War I," wrote Hubbard of Alley's alleged "first significant sexual experience" while on R & R from the trenches at age 21, "Alley and a gay friend had an encounter with two men from the Chinese Labour Corps." Ah - a gay friend. I'd read Alley's account of this long-ago meeting - the only account. He and his mate were on brief furlough behind the Somme front lines when they met the Chinese. The four men drank wine, ate crusty French bread, and quarrelled about who should have the privilege of paying the bill. Alley's account made no mention of sex. He made no mention that his friend was gay. So how do we know this? Answer - we don't. We made it up, because it suits a larger theory, and we have set the scene to pronounce further on why Alley went to China when his postwar farming venture in back-country Taranaki failed. "Sex, in fact," wrote Hubbard, "was part of the reason the 30-year-old left New Zealand for China." This led through to the still-more controversial Brady claim that, 30 years on from his alleged enjoyment of Chinese takeaways with his French bread. Alley was having sex with his Chinese students at his Shandan School in northwest China. No book reviewer subsequently challenged Brady's assertions on Alley's homosexual practice. Nicholas Reid, writing for the Dominion Post under a heading "Rewi Alley on a Sex Mission, too", simply took it as datum, and admonished Brady for not condemning more roundly Alley's dalliance with young Chinese men. The sex claims became the springboard of a litany of distaste. Reid went on to accuse Alley more or less of cowardice for not protesting or intervening when his adopted sons were beaten up and imprisoned in the Cultural Revolution, claimed that almost everything New Zealanders had written about Alley was "hagiographic drivel", that the Chinese leadership did not respect him, and so on. His claims extended far beyond anything in the book. Reid's review was a classic case of a reviewer standing astride someone else's book and proclaiming his own prejudice. Jonathan Mirsky, in the Asian Wall Street Journal, took the same hostile approach, beginning his review: "China produces a lot of sad stories, and this must be one of the saddest…" Thus, again, one of the great New Zealand stories is apparently struck down, but again we should ask whether the reviewer is not simply exercising his prejudice, and whether he can be trusted. Derek Round reviewed the book more fairly in the Press, but then, as an ex-bureau chief of Reuters in Hong Kong, he knew more about the actual circumstances of the Alley story. He praised much of the book, though he dismissed Brady's claim to have exploded any Rewi Alley myth, and commented, discreetly, that she made too much of Alley's sex life. Jack Body's Listener review criticised Brady's cavalier dismissal of Body's 1998 opera Alley, when she apparently hadn't seen it. Brady's determination that everyone parroted the Rewi Alley "myth" had caused her to miss the fact that the opera was structured, exactly as the book is, on the so-called "Faustian choice" of 1952 when Alley decided to stay on in China and accept the role of writing acceptable propaganda for the revolutionary government. But Body, too, found much of the book exciting - an almost racy read. No one, as it turned out, directly addressed the most sensational claim in the book - Alley's alleged homosexual transgressions with his students. This is perhaps strange, because it is here that Brady most obviously departs from the academic rigour evident elsewhere in the book. Alley's active homosexuality at his famous school is presented as fact, but is predicated mainly on the theory of one man. From the start, Brady is determined to out Alley - not any kind of slur these days, one should add - but an ethical problem exists here. Should one unequivocally out someone such as Alley, who never declared his sexuality? Brady, like any writer, wants to pattern her story and it is an obvious structural strength for her to link the dissemblance required by a gay in last century's New Zealand, and post-revolutionary China, to the other masks Alley adopted to survive in China. To me, this is insufficient reason to break the ethical caveat, but this is her book. Even so, she has a problem. For if Alley was dead by the time Brady got started, and if he did not describe sexual encounters in letters, and did not directly discuss sexual encounters with anyone to whom Brady had access, how can she know? From the 1930s period her technique is this. She combs the literature for examples of the "sexual tourism" indulged by Christopher Isherwood, W H Auden, Noel Coward and others who visited Shanghai in the 1930s, who were delighted by, and wrote about, the open attitude to gay sex in this cross-roads city of East and West - youths available to soap you and perform whatever favours in the bathhouses, and by offer in the street. She then writes that in the liberal climate of Shanghai, Alley "was able to explore his sexuality for the first time". Well, as with that alleged sexual encounter in World War I, maybe, maybe not. The correct language here has to be conditional: "Alley would have been able to explore…" There is no evidence that he did, aside from two photos, published in the book, that are mildly homoerotic. Brady's categories proliferate as she tries to nail Alley on this one. Homoerotic, homosexual, even - a new one for my vocab at least - "homosocial". But however many categories, you can't get beyond the fact that no one knows. Alley at this time was still an Anglican, imbued with ideas of social reform, seeking out missionaries in Shanghai, exploring the surrounding countryside and pitching in with famine relief. You wouldn't exactly call him a sybarite. Then come the 1940s, and Alley's Bailie School in Shandan, a school
that taught almost exclusively peasant youth. Here the subject is further
ramped, and Brady makes her claim: "But it is undeniable that Rewi
Alley had sexual relations with his [male] students…" |
| |
|
|
'The Gay Red,' by Jack Body, The Listener,
(14 December 2002) "In 1998 Jack Body and Geoff Chapple wrote the opera Alley, which was performed at the New Zealand International Festival of the Arts in Wellington [along with Stuart Hoar's Yo Banfa]. Both productions were disappointing to many in the audience, not least because they maintained the myth of Alley rather than attempting to get beyond it." It's a shame that Anne-Marie Brady did not get to see the opera for herself, rather than relying on second-hand opinion. The motivation behind the opera was to do this very thing, to strip away the myth and to explore the drama and paradoxes of Alley's remarkable life. I find her misrepresentation of our opera disturbing, and I suspect other readers will find equal cause to protest other aspects of this book. But provocation is clearly its intention. Alley's life is widely known from the several authorised biographies, including a (ghostwritten) autobiography. These, together with his own published poetry and prose, tend to leave us with an impression of a two-dimensional personality, about whom the only news is good news. In 1997, when I was working on my opera, the then artistic director of the New Zealand International Festival of the Arts, having done some background reading, referred to Alley disparagingly as a "do-gooder Scoutmaster". However, the eyes that stare out at us from the blue monochrome cover of Brady's book are more those of an apparatchik than a scoutmaster; the masklike face over a formal, buttoned-up collar gives nothing away. This is certainly not the conventional view of the great humanitarian, the Kiwi adventurer, the man of action, the lover of life, the good friend of the Chinese masses. But the book, as clinically academic as it may appear from the cover, is a compelling, almost racy, read. And it is a book that needed to be written. Although some will doubtless interpret the book as character assassination, I believe that it provides us with the opportunity to understand better the man, a real human being, fallible, flawed, vulnerable. The 60 years through which he lived in China, the huge social and political convulsions that he observed and was a participant in, are beyond the imagining of most of us. It is a story with an epic sweep. It's easy, in hindsight, to expose and deride the compromises of Alley's later years as an apologist for the Communist government as a betrayal of his earlier humanistic idealism, but, if viewed within the ever-shifting social and political landscape of post-1949 China, the issues become far more complex. This book provides insights into the forces at work, the pressures being brought to bear, the turning point being "the Faustian choice" described in chapter six, when Alley chooses to remain in China after the Communist victory. The following chapter, "Friend of China", is by far the longest in the book. Here, a new kind of drama unfolds. Who can know the details of Alley's inner life through this period, his uncertainties, his fears? Deprived of the kind of social engagement that he had previously relished, Alley's life superficially appeared to become one of comfort and privilege, but, as this book reveals, the dangers became increasingly acute. As the Cultural Revolution was unleashed, everyone from the highest to the lowest was vulnerable. Foreign friends were in no way immune from arrest and imprisonment or deportation. In 1968, Alley instructed Pip, his brother in New Zealand, to burn all his letters to his family, fearful that they might contain comments that could compromise and endanger him. Undoubtedly, the most controversial issue that this book raises is Alley's homosexuality. Brady argues, persuasively I believe, that this fact, which was hidden from public view for much of Alley's life, is an important key to an understanding of his personality and the choices he made. The wearing of a mask, the strategy that many gay men are forced to adopt, makes dissemblance into an art. Alley's inner world, the world he grew increasingly wary of sharing either in conversation or in letters, can only be imagined. This book lays the ground for enabling us to begin to penetrate this world. Although some of Brady's commentary occasionally strikes me as a little too strident and lacking in empathy for her subject, in dismantling the image of Alley as an impossible hero, she has opened up the path for a clearer and more balanced understanding of one of the most colourful and remarkable lives ever lived by a New Zealander. |
| |
'Rewi Alley on a sex mission, too,' Nicholas Reid, Dominion Post, (30 Novemeber 2002) REWI ALLEY was partly attracted to China by sex. He was homosexual. New Zealand in the 1920s was not very accepting of his orientation. The male bath-houses of Shanghai seemed a better bet. He did have some genuine and very admirable humanitarian concerns, but in both his Gung Ho movement and the school he helped to run, young Chinese men were a great part of the attraction. Anne-Marie Brady is at pains to stress that Alley was not a paedophile. His many Chinese sexual partners were all older teenagers or in their early 20s. Still, there may be an element of unnecessary politeness in Brady's approach. Would she have described Alley's sexual activities so courteously if he had been, say, a heterosexual bedding young Chinese women? Or a missionary misusing access to orphaned teenagers? For the reality is that Alley was a privileged Westerner who had power over his young men. He "adopted" two, but later did not protest or intervene in any way when they were beaten up and imprisoned during the Cultural Revolution. Brady, lecturer in political science at Canterbury, has not written a biography of Alley, but a detailed, scrupulously researched and very fair-minded examination of Alley's reputation. A eulogistic journalist once claimed that Alley displayed an admirable Kiwi "lack of bullshit". The direct opposite appears to have been the case. Bullshit was Alley's life-blood. In the 1930s, his Gung Ho (Chinese industrial cooperative) rapidly became as corrupt and inefficient as the factories it was supposed to supplant. The experimental school in the 1940s ended up being run on traditional authoritarian lines. In other words, his two main humanitarian ventures were failures. And yet they were the only substance to his later inflated reputation as a humanitarian. Once the Communists took power in 1949, Alley stayed in China by conforming to their new Puritanism, suppressing his sexuality, and grinding out propaganda for them. As honest reportage of China, everything he wrote is worthless. Brady says he displayed "the natural human desire for security and safety" under a totalitarian regime. That is to say, he behaved just like most occupied Europeans under the Nazis. Privately he grumbled and he once referred to Mao as a "prick". Publicly, for 40 years, he slavishly followed the party line. He supported the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution when they were in progress, denounced them when the leadership denounced them, lived comfortably while millions died during the 1950s famines, accepted Deng's new state monopoly capitalism, and opposed the democracy movement in the 1980s. Did the Chinese leadership respect him? Of course not. His myth was simply a propaganda tool to influence one small insignificant country on the periphery of the Western alliance. Before this book, almost everything that New Zealanders (journalists, politicians, academics) had written about Alley was hagiographic drivel. Negative rumours about Alley were airily dismissed as Cold War, or "McCarthyist", rhetoric. But the negative rumours were essentially true. Notoriously, writers of hagiographic drivel are fairly shameless people. Still, it would be nice to think that Brady's temperate, reasonable and well-documented book does provoke at least some red faces. |
| |
'Rewi Alley 'not a saint',' Neil Birss, Christchurch Press
(23 November 2002) In the 1930s and 1940s Alley was to the world a secular version of Mother Teresa. Churches collected money for Alley's work in China in the 1930s. New Zealand children sent savings to him. Corso, when it was still the major aid organisation in the country, supported Alley's industrial cooperative movement and his Shandan Bailie School. A monument at Springfield commemorates his work in China, which led to Christchurch's sister city relationship with the province of Gansu. This is where Alley did much work before the communist takeover. His old school in Christchurch remembers him proudly. Among the few New Zealand sceptics was Sir Robert Muldoon, who refused to be photographed with him. While Alley may have done good work, he whitewashed the abhorrent. Mao Tse-Tung's Great Leap Forward killed 20 million to 43 million people from 1959 to 1961. No-one know the true number. It was the bloodiest bungle in history, and the worst famine. Far from the Western-liberal myth of the Red Emperor at least feeding the Chinese people, Mao caused such starvation that some peasants resorted to cannibalism. Yet here's what Alley wrote of the Leap: "Out of this struggle have come the strides into the future, the seething up of the people's communes with their spate of inventions and scientific discoveries, the feeling that the new way works, that it gives the people the power to do anything they want to. They can make the rivers flow over the mountain ranges, raise the agricultural and industrial production to heights scarcely believable - more than doubling steel production in one year." Asian-affairs journalist Jonathan Mirsky in the New York Review of Books more than a decade ago suggested that the "deeply compromised" Alley misled American writer Edgar Snow into believing there was no famine in China. Alley's defence of Mao's madness makes George Bernard Shaw's defence of Stalinist Russia look trivial. University of Canterbury political science lecturer Anne-Marie Brady in a new book questions Alley's reputation. The University of Auckland turned it down as too controversial. So the book comes to us from London. "He was a human, not a saint," said Dr Brady of Alley, known among sceptics of the day in China as Screwy Roo-ie, partly because of his outlandish Kiwi shorts and socks. "Because of his public role, any other imperfect aspects of his life were air-brushed out. First by Edgar Snow, then by Roo-ie himself." The Mother Teresa-type myth had a dark side: allegations that Alley was a paedophile. Dr Brady does not support this view, but believes the rabid homophobic attitudes of New Zealand in those days helped to keep Alley, who was gay, in China. She's right. The concern is about his whitewashing a horrendous crime against humanity. Dr Brady, who has lived in China, believes Alley had no alternative but to be an apologist for Mao. "If he had criticised him he would have gone to jail, and his adopted children would have been in terrible trouble." The Communists exploited this Leftist but surprisingly non-ideological fellow traveller. They used his persona for their own purposes. "Rewi Alley made himself useful," Dr Brady said, adding, however, that she believes he tried through his life generally to do good. Alley published some books at Christchurch's Caxton Press, paying partly with funds raised in New Zealand for his good works. Dr Brady, whose book on Alley will be reviewed in The Press, has another book on China coming out, this time about how the People's Republic manages foreigners. This is relevant to New Zealand Leftists' claims of a special New Zealand-China tie. China has managed New Zealand well. Generations of our politicians have swallowed the line that China and New Zealand have a special relationship. Dr Brady's take on this: "That's what China says to all countries: it's a form of politeness and also a form of diplomacy." Dr Brady's book on Alley, Friend of China, the Myth of Rewi Alley, will be available through Macmillan publishers. Right on hopes Christchurch City Libraries, which has a stack of Rewi
Alley material, including some for children, buys sufficient copies of Dr
Brady's Allen book. It's a big purchase for an individual at $102.95.
Canterbury people need copies in the libraries so they can make up their
own minds about Alley. |
|
'A glimpse inside a darker Alley,' Anthony Hubbard, Sunday Star Times,
(03 November 2002) REWI ALLEY became a hero in China and in his native land. New Zealanders honoured him as a sort of male Mother Teresa: the Kiwi who spent 60 years in China fighting for the poor. Chinese leaders lauded him as a special "friend of China". He was pictured shaking hands with Mao Zedong, Zhou Enlai, Deng Xiaoping. He became perhaps the most famous foreigner living in that country. In old age he was a legendary figure, an ancient eagle. Visitors to his apartment in Beijing found a hook-nosed sage surrounded by masterpieces of Chinese art. He had witnessed epic events and their aura still clung to him. Alley had a gravely charisma. Anne-Marie Brady, a political scientist from Canterbury University, seeks to demythologise the hero. Her new book - Friend of China - The Myth of Rewi Alley shows a flawed and complex creature, a human being rather than a colossus. Her aim, she says, is not to destroy his reputation, but to see him in the round. "The problem is," she says, "that the stuff that's been written about him was so hagiographical". In China, 15 years after his death, adulatory Alley documentaries are still made. The two biographies published in New Zealand, she says, were censored by him. And his autobiography was "carefully processed". Alley was actively involved in the myth-making. Brady points out there has always been a counter-mythology, though not so widely published. Alley's enemies portrayed him as "a womaniser who keeps a woman in every Chinese city he visits" or as "a pederast who stayed on to write propaganda in communist China after 1949 because he was supplied with young boys by the Chinese government". Others said he was blackmailed into writing for the Chinese government because of this sexual preference. In fact, Alley was gay, a fact he never publicly admitted, but Brady says he was no child molester. While Alley was idolised in China and New Zealand, Brady discovered many sinologists were harshly critical of him. To them, he was an uncritical propagandist for the Chinese communists, prepared to lie about dreadful events and alter his story to suit the latest change in the party line. Brady finds a link between Alley's sexuality and his later role as a political propagandist and mythmaker. "As a gay man living in an era when homosexuality was a punishable offence [in New Zealand], Alley was forced from an early age to play out a role in order to disguise his sexual orientation. His ability to play-act and suppress his natural inclinations would stand him in good stead." Sex, in fact, was part of the reason the 30-year-old left New Zealand
for China. As a soldier fighting in France during World War I, Alley and a
gay friend had an encounter with two men from the Chinese Labour corps.
"It was the first time that I had any inkling of what China
meant," he wrote later. |
|
|
Although Alley portrayed the meeting as merely one of friendship, his friend Courtney Archer, who spent six years with him in China, believed it was his first significant sexual experience. And China's attitude to homosexuality, says Brady, was traditionally much more tolerant than New Zealand's. "It's only really since 1949 [when the communists took power] that intolerance for homosexuality has developed in China - and even then it's still very much a top-down, artificially imposed attitude," she says. Alley had failed in his post-war attempt at farming in New Zealand and felt himself the black sheep of the family, unable to match the academic achievements of his siblings. In Shanghai in 1927, he found a job as a fireman and a society that accepted his sexuality. "When he arrived in China," Brady writes, this later champion of China "took an instant dislike to the Chinese". He preferred the "well-organised" Japanese. "After a holiday in Korea he wrote: 'This Japanese dictatorship is the best thing that has happened in Korea. She is dragging the people up to a decent standard of living'," Brady says. This, however, was omitted from Willis Airey's 1969 biography of Alley, a book Alley and a friend "went through with a fine-tooth comb" before it was published. And the letter it came from was destroyed at Alley's request. Brady, a fluent Chinese speaker who began her research into Alley in 1989 for a masters thesis, found Alley's brother Pip destroyed all the letters he received from Shanghai. "A terrible tragedy" for a researcher, she says. But these letters would have been big trouble for the later hero of communist China. In these early days Alley was an admirer of the British Empire, like many other Kiwis of his generation. In one surviving letter he spoke contemptuously about "Red organisations" fomenting trouble among impressionable Chinese students. He also seems to have shared some of the expatriates' contempt for the downtrodden Shanghainese. These attitudes slowly changed. In the 1930s, as a factory inspector in Shanghai, he witnessed dreadful scenes of child labour and exploitation. He became involved in the Chinese Industrial Co-operative Movement, whose abbreviated form in Chinese was Gung Ho - a phrase that entered the English language. It was this work that earned him the reputation in New Zealand as a great mover and shaker in the industrialisation of China. Alley was "more than any other individual, responsible for the development of Chinese industry," said an article in New Zealand's School Journal in 1946. The reality was much more modest. Alley was boosted as the public face of Gung Ho, partly to attract international funds. But "despite the glorious publicity CIC received," says Brady, "the scheme to develop a co-operative movement in China never really succeeded." Alley was sacked from the movement's executive in 1942 after it was found he had allowed its factories to make guns and blankets for the Communist Party. He switched to the Bailie School, where young Chinese combined book learning with practical work in industry. As headmaster of the Shandan Bailie School in dirt-poor Gansu province, he gained further fame and a good deal of money raised through Corso, in New Zealand. "My father remembers collecting pennies for Rewi's school," Brady says. Archer told Brady, "Nobody thought anything of Rewi sleeping with the boys [of the school]. It just happened". It is important to remember, says Brady, all of the pupils at the school were called boys, regardless of their age. Alley had sex with students, but only those in their late teens and early 20s. "Alley was not a
paedophile." And while sleeping with students is now condemned in the
West, she says, it was not unusual in China at that time. |
|
|
After the communist takeover in 1949, no foreigner could last for long as a school headmaster. In 1952, during the "Three Antis" movement against "corruption, waste and bureaucracy", Alley was accused of being an agent of Western powers, a reactionary spy and anti-revolutionary. He shifted later that year to Beijing: it was the start of a 35-year-long career as propagandist. This is the most controversial part of his life. Alley propounded the party line even when he disagreed with it. He publicly defended actions that now seem indefensible. He lied about appalling events. In the early 1960s, for instance, a famine killed millions of Chinese. Alley wrote articles rejecting Western reports of the crisis. Alley knew about the problems China faced, says Brady, though he might not have realised its extent. "His Chinese family [he had two adopted sons, plus grandchildren] unable like himself to get extra food rations, struggled during this time," says Brady. "Alley had the reverse problem; as millions starved he became obese and he wrote to friends and family asking for suggestions on how to lose weight." During the Cultural Revolution, he denounced the official ogre, Deng
Xiaoping, and praised Mao. His adopted son Alan was beaten repeatedly and
imprisoned during this period; his son Mike was forced to dig ditches for
two years. In 1977 Alley said he "breathed a sigh of relief"
when Deng came to power. And privately told friends he thought Mao was a
"prick" for what he did to his comrades in the Cultural
Revolution. Later, he privately opposed Deng's free-market reforms while
praising them publicly. Alley was trying to counter the extremism of the anti-communists, who could see no good in anything the Chinese government did and would seize on the smallest criticism made by Alley and use it in their crusade. And Alley did voice criticisms to officials - but in private. Other pro-communist foreigners, such as Australian journalist Wilfred Burchett, eventually broke with China "because they didn't like what was going on. But they had other lives. Alley was first and foremost a China person", says Brady. There was nothing for him to return to in New Zealand. After spending so many years studying the man, says Brady, it is hard for her to stand apart from him. "He wasn't a saint at all. He's a complex individual and has very human desires and aspirations. He had achievements and he had terrible failings. I just lay it all out on the table and leave it for the reader to decide." Archer said Alley made a
Faustian choice when he decided to remain in China after the revolution.
He wanted to spend the rest of his life there and he would do so, even if
it meant the suppression of his own sexuality and of his personal
convictions. Archer was right about the Faustian choice, says Brady,
"and the implication of that is that you sell your soul". And in
a sense, she concedes, that is what Alley did. COPYRIGHT NZEDGE.COM IP HOLDINGS LIMITED
1998-2007. |
|
|
Aitken | Alda | Alley
| Atack | Batten | Bowen |
Britten |
|
|
|