|
|
 Self,
Race, Drugs & Justice in New Zealand
In
the Hawke’s Bay the heavy early morning dew – ‘Heretaunga
haukunui’ the Maori call it – carries the chill signal of approaching
autumn. Already the seasons turn. It only seemed to be yesterday that we
were getting ready for Christmas. Family, who came home to the kainga at
Waiohiki for the break, have now gone back to their own places to face the
busy year ahead. Gone too are the great swarms of teenagers, cuzzies and
friends, moving noisily in their respective cohorts, up and down the pa
road, up and down, up and down (“Uncle, we’re bored!”), all through
the long, hot, summer holiday, nights. We didn’t begrudge their
wanderings a jot. We had about 19 people sleeping at home over the festive
period. It was great to have them all come, and great to see them all go.
And there were other happy times.
In late January my latest grandson – Rua O’Reilly - was born. You
might think Rua is a Maori name, but in this case it’s Gaelic, derived
from his mom’s granddad, Rua McKenzie. I’ll have you know that the
name Rua runs way back in my family too. Giolla Iosa Rua O’Reilly is
credited in the family prayers with having founded the Franciscan Abbey at
Cavan around the year 1300. In any case the period of good times and
notional holidays was too damn short. The inevitable tasks associated with
meaningful social action can only be put off for so long, and ‘so
long’ is short on patience! We seem to have hit 2005 at warp speed
already – and I’m loving it!
|
|

|
The
summer break has been expensive to our methamphetamine project. We had a
few dramas with people spinning out, the inevitable consequence of use. P
can really make people paranoid, grumpy and very unpleasant to deal with
when they’re coming down, or when they’re in their post binge
depression. We’ve lost a bit of ground. Some people who had foresworn P
are back on the stuff. Some of our key leaders have been ‘got at’ and
have had subtle (and sometimes not so subtle) pressure put on them to
reduce their endorsement of a P free community. Some are less prepared to
take a stand than they were late last year. It’s frustrating, but doing
nothing is not an option. This is one substance that we have to be
prepared to be relentless, boringly relentless, in building community
resilience.
A crew of us traveled to Waitangi for our national day commemorations. If
you’ve never been to Waitangi on Waitangi Day then get your arse there
next year. It is unique, a unique day, a unique place, a chance to step
into the psyche of the nation and literally walk around it. It’s
different every time. I must say that 2005 was one of the more enjoyable
years. The changes were quirky. It was interesting to see Hone Harawira
beginning to slide himself into the glove of a mainstream political
persona and his siblings trying their best to be reserved and diplomatic.
The energy, the youth and the debates all happened down at Te Tii, the so
called ‘bottom marae’. This marae lives, in that it has a resident
hapu, Ngati Rahiri, whereas the ‘top’ marae, where the Treaty House,
the Whare Runanga and the navy flagstaff all sit, is more or less
symbolic. In any case the real dialogue tended to happen down at Te Tii.
The new crew on site were definitely the Maori Party but Destiny also made
their presence felt. The other parties, bar Labour, all featured too.
There were young people and a good feeling everywhere. Over the other side
of the bridge, the demographics of power were evident as a much older
cluster of Labour Party stalwarts and key Maori deal brokers holed up at
the Copthorne Hotel.
|
|

|
We
have hosted our first international visitor generated from this nzedge
‘nga kupu aroha’ blog. She is a Canadian woman, Johanne Robitaille.
Johanne works with the indigenous nations within Quebec, using a process
we’d describe as ‘restorative justice’. She has a very soft and
peaceful approach and I happily took a day off to wander around with
Johanne, introducing her to our whanau, showing her our various projects
and swapping ideas and approaches. Viva nzedge!
At this time in an election year the key lobby groups lay the platform for
their various demands on the Government. The ‘gang’ word has, in the
past, provided rich pickings for the Police Association in terms of
leveraging increased numbers and extended powers. True to form we have
been presented with a recent Police Association announcement about the
alleged worsening situation around P syndicates penetrating our borders,
the continued rise of organised crime and the high potential for street
gang warfare. Those of us dealing with the impact of P readily acknowledge
that the Police Association gave us very early warning about the incoming
social tsunami of P, but their confusing position as a union and
aggressive advocate for their members meant that the ‘boy who cried
wolf’ factor came into play and many people saw the ‘warning’ as
another hyped up ploy. This time the predictions of trouble ahead were
accompanied by a call for a commission of enquiry into organized crime and
gangs.

|
|

|
In
the first instance I don’t know what I don’t know, and if front-line
officers engaged in surveillance are saying things are so, then a
reasonable person is compelled to listen. For my part we seem to be stuck
in a less than useful paradigm where we repeatedly present a negative
prophecy (often self fulfilling at that) instead of a positive prophecy.
We seem to have blithely accepted the projected 15% annual rate of climb
in the prison population even at a time when the overall rate of crime is
dropping. One fears the projection is set to become a target. A time for
reflection on what we’re doing is called for, so I accept the Police
Association’s proposition for some form of enquiry into organized crime
and gangs and the whole shebang.
A bit of trouble with young gang prospects, the ‘Dog Soldiers’ broke
out around Hawke’s Bay over Christmas. After a call from Thomas Heremia,
a community development worker heading the Maraenui Urban Renewal project
I had a think about the situation and wrote a paper. In brief though these
are my conclusions:
When it comes to dealing with youth gangs in New Zealand there is
little agreement as to what works. We lack evidence based research and we
better start building in research and independent evaluation into our
initiatives. Many people think of the NZ gang as the 1970’s stereotype
of young Hemi and Hori down the corner dressed in their leathers. But the
demography of gangs has changed over the last generation. Besides the
traditional indigenous groups, gangs have become inter-generational and
multi-national.
But at a level down from the ‘big picture’ what we are actually
dealing with seems to be a recurring problem with a number of whanau who
have complex and severe needs
These whanau are difficult to reach and to establish an effective rapport
with. They miss out on many of the social and economic services and
supports that are available to them.
|
|

|
In
Hawke’s Bay there seems to be goodwill amongst a wide range of groups
and agencies dealing with or affected by the issue of youth gangs, whanau
development and community development. There is potential for a broad
initiative across Hawke’s Bay utilizing the existing network of public
service intersectoral fora. The Government’s family based policies seem
to hold most promise as a programme platform and so it follows that the
Ministry of Social Development is the natural lead agency.
Hot on the heels of the local youth gang issue blowing up came a call from
Sir Russell Pettigrew who invited me to meet with him and Garth Mc Vicar
from the Sensible Sentencing Trust. Despite the vast ground that separated
us in terms of ‘how’, we seemed to more closely share a vision of a
better and more inclusive New Zealand. Sir Russell has supported my work
before. At our meeting he recounted a story of how he’d been rung by the
then Speaker, Sir Richard Harrison who had been asked by Prime Minister
Muldoon to see if anything could be done to help my work trust along.
Harrison delegated the job to Pettigrew and it fell to Sir Russell to come
around and meet with me and the crew. Before leaving home he told his wife
where he was going and to ring the Police if he wasn’t back in an hour.
Having arrived at our place he then got so involved in discussion that the
best part of a couple of hours had drifted past and he had to excuse
himself to let all know he was alright.
Sir Russell and Garth McVicar have agreed to participate in the
“Transformational Symposium’ that we are running with John Wareham and
the Eagles Foundation USA. There will be some 40 participants in the
symposium, more or less 15 leaders and up and coming leaders from the two
major gangs and a number of community participants.
|
|

|
The Symposium will be
led and facilitated by John Wareham, a New Zealand born, New York headquartered,
leadership psychologist. Wareham is confidante and counselor to top
Fortune 200 chiefs. John has authored some ten books, on the human side of
achievement, including 13-language reference classic, ‘Anatomy
of Great Executive’. His two most recent books are ‘How
to Break Out of Prison’, a life-changer, and ‘Chancey On Top’, a critically acclaimed novel, the opening of
which is set in New Zealand.
John Wareham says that leadership is about more than getting things done.
He promotes developing people along the way; people who can take over and
leverage achievement for everyone. This then is a capacity building
initiative.
John Wareham is founder and chief executive of The Eagles Foundation of
America, a non-profit dedicated to transforming the lives of those in
prison and on the fringes of society. The Eagles mission is to identify
and develop an elite corp of leadership talent from potentially excluded
members of society, with a goal of effecting a dramatic realisation of
individual and social benefit. John will be accompanied by Joseph Roberts,
president of the Eagles Foundation. Mr. Roberts is a reconstructed former
felon, and graduate of Sarah Lawrence College, the prestigious Ivy League
college.

|
|

|
The programme is
scheduled to take place at Te Taiwhenua o Heretaunga, Hastings, over the
period 4-6 March 2005. There will be pre-work for the event. This includes
completing a number of readings, an eclectic set of excerpts from Plato,
Aristotle, Shakespeare, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King among others.
A tikanga, a set of rules, will be applied to the programme. These will
include:
| • |
Rahui:
we agree that we will not indulge in alcohol or illicit drugs from
the start of the project on the Friday until the conclusion on
Sunday |
| • |
Commitment:
we agree to complete our readings homework, and to stick to the
programme timetable, no taking off or drifting in and out; each
crew responsible for their own troops |
| • |
Kaupapa:
we agree that this project seeks personal insight towards personal
change so we can effect a better future for ourselves, our
families and our country. The kaupapa is bigger than any of us or
our interpersonal grudges |
| • |
Integrity:
we agree to be open and honest with each other and with ourselves
|
I have been moving
around the country talking to the leadership of the participating
groups.
I’m hopeful of a really positive outcome for the Symposium, so,
whoever you are and wherever you are come March 4th,
say a little karakia for us will you. |
|
|

|
Arohanui.
Denis.
|